Dr. Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto

Dr. Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto


Victoria is Assistant Dean at the LBJ School of Public Affairs and a contributor to MSNBC and Telemundo. Her areas of expertise in the domestic policy landscape include immigration, Latinos, women and childcare, and economic equity. more→


Victoria brings an interdisciplinary lens to understanding policy development and its intersection with institutional and political contexts. Underlying her academic work is the applicability of rigorous research to on-the-ground policy realities.

Dr. Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto
Dr. Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto

Recent Media

This post originally appeared on NBCLatino

First the bad news, let’s get that out of the way. Latino youth are at a double disadvantage when it comes to political participation. Latinos are the group with the lowest likelihood of turnout and across groups young folks are less likely to vote. That means that young Latinos are theoretically the least likely group to participate politically.

Political participation is a result of resources.  Put simply, those with more money and education are more likely to register and turnout.  Latinos have the dubious honor of not only having the lowest resource levels but having suffered the greatest decline in wealth during the recession.  The white-to-Latino ratio of median wealth after the recession stood at 18-to-1; before the recession, that ratio was less than half.  And in terms of educational resources, Latinos are once again at a disadvantage with Latino dropout rates at least doubling those of other groups.

However, rich and poor young folks alike are less likely to turnout than their parents or even grandparents.  In the last election 24 percent of 18-29 year olds voted, while 45 percent of voters 30 and older did.  Even in the youth centered 2008 election the 18-29 year olds lagged at least ten points behind all other age brackets.  And state voting laws don’t help.  In 2008 in state’s that did not have Election Day Registration young Americans were about nine percent less likely to turnout.  Younger folks are already less likely to turnout and any mechanism that makes the process of voting harder further suppresses the youth vote.

It seems like bad news all around.  Especially, since Latinos have the highest percentage of youth, one-third of Latinos are under the age of 18 compared to one quarter for non-Latinos.  Latinos are becoming younger, not older.

The first silver lining is that younger voters are becoming more racially and ethnically diverse.  While only 7 percent of the 30 plus electorate was Latino, 15 percent of the 18-29 year old electorate was Latino in the 2010 election.  And in the 2008 election Latinos as well as African-Americans increased their turnout from the previous presidential election.  This data is good news not just because it shows a tangible increase in Latino youth voting, but because we know from political science research that voting is habit forming.  Once a person has voted, they are more likely to do so in the future.   (more…)

Soccer moms were the go to gals in the 1996 Presidential election. Eight years later George W. Bush again looked to the ladies, zeroing in on security moms. In the last presidential election a hockey mom herself was put at the top of the ticket. And leading up to the 2012 election women Wal-Mart moms are the political date of choice.

The different “moms” of the last couple of elections have changed names, but they remain generally similar in terms of demographic characteristics – white, middle class, and suburban. These moms vote and they are moved by tangible day-to-day concerns related to the well-being of their family. Campaigns are smart to target these women, but would be unwise to do so to the exclusion of the growing population of mamás—Latina moms. (more…)